| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
blg
Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: pos |
|
|
Hello,
I’m using tinyerp-server-setup-4.0.3.exe and tinyerp-client-setup-4.0.3.1.exe under Windows XP.
I’m very happy about it. Great job.
Now, I want to install POS module.
I don’t find the doc concerning it.
I have unzip pos module in bin/addons of the serve rand with the client in admin/ update modules.
I get this message: : ‘ No module named pos’
Thanks in advance for your help.
Benoit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jardous
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 5 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi... the POS module is not distributed as source files - just binary files (pyc). This may be a big compatibility problem.
The only solution is to force Fabien to publish sources - not just pyc files.
The POS module is announced as GPL, but this is not GPL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
srltab
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I solved this problem (re)writing __init__.py file.
import pos
import sale
import purchase
import account
import account_tax_include
import wizard
import report
NOTE to tiny staff:
Please publish sources of pos module.
Thanks
Simone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
melodie
Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 20 Location: South France
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, on sunday 9th, there is no file such as __init__.py in the pos package.
| Quote: | $ ls -lR
.:
total 64
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 213 avr 2 17:31 __init__.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 731 avr 26 14:25 __terp__.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 981 mai 14 17:07 __terp__.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 17857 avr 26 17:37 pos.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 520 avr 2 17:25 pos_data.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 331 avr 26 14:25 pos_report.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 1224 avr 2 17:25 pos_sequence.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 11044 avr 26 14:46 pos_view.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 471 avr 2 17:25 pos_wizard.xml
drwxr-xr-x 2 melodie users 208 sep 9 18:03 report
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 148 avr 2 17:25 sale_wizard.xml
drwxr-xr-x 2 melodie users 160 sep 9 18:03 wizard
./report:
total 32
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 239 avr 2 17:31 __init__.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 1408 avr 2 17:31 pos_invoice.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 1927 avr 26 15:21 pos_receipt.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 5257 avr 26 15:48 pos_receipt.rml
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 10805 avr 26 15:48 pos_receipt.sxw
./wizard:
total 12
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 221 avr 2 17:31 __init__.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 2004 avr 2 17:31 wizard_pos_payment.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 melodie users 2158 avr 2 17:31 wizard_refund_order.pyc
$ |
I haven't come for months now, fortunately for me I don't wait after tinyerp for my personal projects. I still think that a team working with the GPL licence and not respecting it and it's philosophy does something Bad™.
The documentation of a free software also should be free : why should english reading people get a manual that's half written in french, and french reading people get a manual half written in english, allowing only both languages' readers to get it all about the meaning ?
Free Software and Free Manuals _________________ One more day |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
htgoebel
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 101
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabien Site Admin
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1566 Location: Grand-Rosière, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
Thank you but it seems that both links the same in your page.
About the modules published without sources.
That was an error of our first attempt to release our unpublished modules. We will publish these sources at the same time of the 4.2.0 package. (no garantee, but I hope we will have finnish everything with 10 days)
The main reason is that we have about 150 modules to upload and I prefer not loosing too much time releasing them manually. We have to create new automated releasing and testing scripts for this.
The second reason is that these modules have to be used with the 4.2.0 version. And I don't think they will work with the current stable release.
The third reason is that we'd like to test them one by one before releasing and it takes time.
As a summary, our quality team is first focusing on releasing the next stable 4.2.0, and them will focus on all modules. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
htgoebel
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 101
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Thank you but it seems that both links the same in your page.
|
Fixed.
| Quote: | The main reason is that we have about 150 modules to upload and I prefer not loosing too much time releasing them manually. We have to create new automated releasing and testing scripts for this.
|
Your are doing a disservice to the project at this point:These Modules with missing Sources have been uploded about 4 month ago. Many user claimed they are missing, many bad discussions arose. This is not good for the communities sprit.
On the other hand: As you stated at the last German community Meeting, there should be a new "one-click" publication mechanism in 4.2 (I've not tested 4.2 yet). With this it should be a matter of one hour or so to release the modules. (N.B. Anyway I don't believe, you published the modules manually in the first place.)
And on even another hand: You need to implement the tools for automated publication anyway. You could have done earier and save a lot of bad discussions. _________________ Regards
Hartmut Goebel
IT-Security In Complex Environments
www.goebel-consult.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xlyz
Joined: 17 Sep 2006 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fabien
put all the modules with sources in a big tarball and leak it .
than make a post linking to it with a BIG DISCLAIMER that basically says that they are broken and will break everything and you will give no assistance whatsoever.
worst consequence: you will loose 15 minutes of your time
best: better relation with the community, and possibily some patch |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eSquat
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 82 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="melodie"]The documentation of a free software also should be free : why should english reading people get a manual that's half written in french, and french reading people get a manual half written in english, allowing only both languages' readers to get it all about the meaning ?[/quote]
Well, at least you have the freedom to learn languages. Let me construct a case: Image the documentation were wholly available, but in French only - would you complain that the documentation is not free ? With tongue-in-cheek: More people can make *some* use of the 50/50-documentation. Fewer people would have access to it if this were in, say, French only.
I agree that free software should have free documentation. But in all seriousness: language has *NOTHING* to do with that. _________________ come back later www.esquat.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
norbert_
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 64 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Following up on the modules.
The issue that not all modules are available for the release candidates is quite frustrating. I have an Australian and US business and opted for TinyERP. With rc2 and rc3 the Australian and US accounting modules are not available. So, there is not much I can test really.
We've setup TinyERP 4.1.1. But there I encountered accounting errors. I was hoping to test this issue with rc1-rc3, trial and learn the software in praxis oriented circumstances. But respective modules are not available. So for the time being the server sits idle until the stable release.
Quite a waste really. Any issues or potential bugs I could have reported.
My 5c worth.
Cheers
Norbert |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stefanr
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:15 pm Post subject: The GPL |
|
|
Hi,
we have been bit by this as well. It seems that Tiny does not understand the GPL. You cannot offer a binary module for download and say it is GPL without offering the source code upon request.
If Tiny and its partners do hold all the associated copyrights, they could make the binary module available under some sort of Tiny Shared Source license while the code is not yet published.
Otherwise, Tiny needs to release the source.
Regards,
Stefan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eSquat
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 82 Location: France
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Open Source should go with Open Docs. Over there in the French forum was the question where the announced French version of the Tiny Book is. From what can be understood, there is a password protected version in the wiki. No password == No documentation.
Open Source is a great thing. No question. But it's not all. Some may know the Obfuscated C Contest or Perl's JAPHs - there you have, as with TinyERP, all the source code. But unless you are *VERY* bright, this advances you not a millimeter. Software, especially of a certain complexity, without documentation is often useless to the mere mortal. Calling such software 'free software' or 'open source' degrades to a marketing gimmick.
Did you know that Microsoft is an Open Source company ?
Did you know that Tiny is an Open Source company ?
Let me repeat a link from the user 'melodie' further up: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html - The GNU position on Free Software and Free Documentation _________________ come back later www.esquat.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fabien Site Admin
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1566 Location: Grand-Rosière, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The password of the french doc has been set to 'tiny'. But it's better to use the english one which is more advanced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|